Cancer Institute A national cancer institute
designated cancer center

Iris C. Gibbs, MD, FACR

Publication Details

  • Volumetric Analysis of Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations Contoured for CyberKnife Radiosurgery With 3-Dimensional Rotational Angiography vs Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Neurosurgery Veeravagu, A., Hansasuta, A., Jiang, B., Karim, A. S., Gibbs, I. C., Chang, S. D. 2013; 73 (2): 262-270


    BACKGROUND:: Accurate target delineation has significant impact on brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) obliteration, treatment success, and potential complications of stereotactic radiosurgery. OBJECTIVE:: We compare the nidal contouring of AVMs using fused images of contrasted computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MRI) with matched images of three-dimensional (3-D) cerebral angiography for Cyberknife radiosurgery (CKRS) treatment planning. METHODS:: Between May 2009 and April 2012, 3-D cerebral angiography was integrated into CKRS target planning for thirty consecutive patients. The AVM nidal target volumes were delineated using fused CT and MRI scans versus fused CT, MRI, and 3-D cerebral angiography for each patient. RESULTS:: The mean volume of the AVM nidus contoured with the addition of 3-D cerebral angiography to the CT/MRI fusion (9.09 cm, 95% CI 5.39-12.8 cm) was statistically smaller than the mean volume contoured with CT/ MRI fused scans alone (14.1 cm, 95% CI 9.16-19.1 cm), with a mean volume difference of δ=5.01 cm (p=0.001). Diffuse AVM nidus was associated with larger mean volume differences in comparison to a compact nidus (δ=6.51 vs. 2.11 cm, p=0.02). The mean volume difference was not statistically associated with the patient's gender (male δ=5.61, female δ=5.06, p=0.84), prior hemorrhage status (yes δ=5.69, no δ=5.23, p=0.86), or prior embolization status (yes δ=6.80, no δ=5.95, p=0.11). CONCLUSION:: For brain AVMs treated with CKRS, the addition of 3-D cerebral angiography to CT/MRI fusions for diagnostic accuracy results in a statistically significant reduction in contoured nidal volume as compared to standard CT/MRI fusion-based contouring.

    View details for DOI 10.1227/01.neu.0000430285.00928.30

    View details for PubMedID 23615081

Stanford Medicine Resources:

Footer Links: